You are reading:

SEO No No

We love the web.

Pwned facekick

Ask yourself this: if great search engine optimization (SEO) is all about searchbots being able to make sense out of the code that your content is wrapped up in, what happens when all of your content is contained in a fancy, yet inaccessible Flash movie? The answer is pretty straight forward: your SEO goes down the tubes, and no one finds worthwhile information about your site when they search for it. So how do you prevent your content from being doomed to a black-hole so dense so that no information can escape?

It’s a tough question. There are some promising techniques on the horizon, not the least of which is using Xpath to read content directly from the page, and of course a developer can always choose to simply use less flash. Unfortunately though, indexing content in Flash continues to be an issue the web development community struggles with. So, let’s refine our question.

How do we provide search friendly content on a flash heavy page without a Sr. Product & Marketing Manager at Google calling you out on violating their site quality guidelines?

Volkswagen got a first hand lesson on what is and is not acceptable in SEO practices last week as they were told that using invisible content markup to juice up their search ranking was not something that Google was going to take lightly. Interestingly enough this all came to light when the SEO blog searchengineland.com discovered that the Volkswagon US site, which Google had actually been featuring in their enterprise blog was spoofing their indexable content.

Just goes to show you, there’s no fooling the internet. An army of bloggers out there stands at the ready to keep our search results clean and honest, and they’re not amused by card tricks or rabbits mysteriously appearing out of a dusty top-hat.

2 Comments

1 Davezilla: homepage

what happens when all of your content is contained in a fancy, yet inaccessible Flash movie? The answer is pretty straight forward: your SEO goes down the tubes

Well, not always. Popularity of site has more to do with it. Absolut’s site is a Flash monstrosity, yet they have excellent SEO. Why? Because shitloads of people link to them, and inbound links are the #1 factor in SEO.

That’s what makes this story all the more ridiculous. It’s not like VW has a recognition issue. Everyone knows them and their iconic vehicles. For them to stoop to pathetic SEO tricks like this is just embarrassing.

May 10th, 2007
2 Ryan: homepage

For pure pagerank yes: the more links pointing to a site the better. But at some point do we also think that when the site is indexed, the more content google sees the more it’s able to establish relationships and a context for a given page that will also help with search results?

For example if Volkswagen has a particular car that has a turbocharger, but nowhere on that vehicle’s page does it actually says “with standard turbocharger” would a search for “vw.com turbocharger” have a more difficult time presenting the desired result?

You’re definitely presenting a good point though: saying “SEO goes down the tubes” is a bit too harsh: how about “SEO is dimished”?

May 10th, 2007

about this entry

browse

May 2007
S M T W T F S
« Apr   Jun »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

iphone users

crashpod destinations for the apple iphone

Check out crashpod.net/iphone to get the latest destinations on the run!

feeds

Fresh Crashpod content, delivered directly to your RSS reader.